APPR issues
1. Composite Effectiveness Score out of 60 points:
1/3 from artifacts (20%)
2/3 from observations (40%)
2. State growth score will come in the form of a SLO (student learning objective) for elementary librarians; secondary librarians will be evaluated using past practice measures
3. State growth score will be based on growth in a librarian's 3rd grade classes from pre-test (October) to post-test (June); target is 5 percentage points. Record scores electronically on previously e-mailed roster sheet with a separate sheet for each class. The target column will automatically populate.
4. Local measures for elementary librarians will be achievement (percentage passing) on post-test for the same population as the SLO
5. Observations will earn a point score out of 4 with each category earning a rating on the 1-4 scale. An average will be created and those averages will be used for the end-of-year. Only two highest observation scores will be used for tenured teachers (4 for non-tenured).
6. Danielson Rubric
a. Donains 1, 2, and 3 will be the focus for observations.
b. Teachers will submit artifacts for the 20% (remember 1/3 of your points out of the 60 will come from artifacts)
Artifacts selection is determined by the teacher and self-assessed in collaboration with and input from supervisor
7. Review of observation form
8. Review of Student Learning Objective Template
a. librarian's responsibility: complete Population section and roster template; save both!
b. editing suggestions?
9. Clarification about SLOs and school librarians:
http://www.wswheboces.org/SSS.cfm?subpage=600
10. Common Core and the School Library
LISMA links
Information Fluency from NYC
Literacy Design Collaborative
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
